| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
31/05/2023 |
|
Actualizado : |
31/05/2023 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
RUBIO, V.; SAWCHIK, J.; VAN ES, H. |
|
Afiliación : |
VALENTINA RUBIO DELLEPIANE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Section of Soil and Crop Sciences, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; JORGE SAWCHIK PINTOS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; HAROLD VAN ES, Section of Soil and Crop Sciences, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. |
|
Título : |
Soil health benefits from sequence intensification, fertilization, and no-tillage in annual cropping systems. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Soil Security. 2022, Volume 9, 100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soisec.2022.100074 -- OPEN ACCESS. |
|
ISSN : |
2667-0062 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.soisec.2022.100074 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 14 June 2022; Received in revised form 4 August 2022; Accepted 1 September 2022; Available online 5 September 2022. -- Corresponding author at: Section of Soil and Crop Sciences, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. E-mail address: vr349@cornell.edu (V. Rubio). -- This research was funded by the National Institute of Agricultural Research (INIA), Uruguay. -- Supplementary materials. -- License: This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/). -- |
|
Contenido : |
The expansion of annual cropping systems and associated land cover changes may induce soil degradation, compromising the soil's ability to function and provide ecosystem services, also referred to as soil health (SH). Conservation practices may reduce SH decline, yet their benefits are uncertain. The main objectives of this paper were to apply a comprehensive SH assessment framework to evaluate (i) SH differences in natural grasslands and cropping areas, and (ii) how conservation practices lessen SH deterioration. Soils under natural grasslands were compared to cropped soils from three long-term experiments with treatments evaluating the effects of cover crops and/or pastures incorporation; no-tillage; and crop fertilization for Uruguayan Mollisols. Soil chemical (pH, cation exchange capacity, macro, and micro-nutrients), physical (wet aggregate stability, available water holding capacity, penetration resistance), and biological (organic carbon, active carbon, protein, respiration) indicators were measured. SH was significantly lower across all indicators under cropped areas than under natural grasslands, especially when soil fertility is not adequately maintained in cropping systems. Conservation practices lessened SH degradation, particularly soil biological properties, but had confounding benefits. Overall, gains in SH were linked to adequate soil fertility maintenance and longer active plant growth periods associated with including pastures and cover crops in annual cropping systems. /© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. MenosThe expansion of annual cropping systems and associated land cover changes may induce soil degradation, compromising the soil's ability to function and provide ecosystem services, also referred to as soil health (SH). Conservation practices may reduce SH decline, yet their benefits are uncertain. The main objectives of this paper were to apply a comprehensive SH assessment framework to evaluate (i) SH differences in natural grasslands and cropping areas, and (ii) how conservation practices lessen SH deterioration. Soils under natural grasslands were compared to cropped soils from three long-term experiments with treatments evaluating the effects of cover crops and/or pastures incorporation; no-tillage; and crop fertilization for Uruguayan Mollisols. Soil chemical (pH, cation exchange capacity, macro, and micro-nutrients), physical (wet aggregate stability, available water holding capacity, penetration resistance), and biological (organic carbon, active carbon, protein, respiration) indicators were measured. SH was significantly lower across all indicators under cropped areas than under natural grasslands, especially when soil fertility is not adequately maintained in cropping systems. Conservation practices lessened SH degradation, particularly soil biological properties, but had confounding benefits. Overall, gains in SH were linked to adequate soil fertility maintenance and longer active plant growth periods associated with including pastures and cover crops in annual crop... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Cover crops; No-tillage; Pastures; Sequence intensification index; Soil health; Soil quality. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
P30 Ciencia del suelo y manejo del suelo |
|
URL : |
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006222000405/pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02928naa a2200253 a 4500
001 1064173
005 2023-05-31
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a2667-0062
024 7 $a10.1016/j.soisec.2022.100074$2DOI
100 1 $aRUBIO, V.
245 $aSoil health benefits from sequence intensification, fertilization, and no-tillage in annual cropping systems.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArticle history: Received 14 June 2022; Received in revised form 4 August 2022; Accepted 1 September 2022; Available online 5 September 2022. -- Corresponding author at: Section of Soil and Crop Sciences, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. E-mail address: vr349@cornell.edu (V. Rubio). -- This research was funded by the National Institute of Agricultural Research (INIA), Uruguay. -- Supplementary materials. -- License: This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-nd/4.0/). --
520 $aThe expansion of annual cropping systems and associated land cover changes may induce soil degradation, compromising the soil's ability to function and provide ecosystem services, also referred to as soil health (SH). Conservation practices may reduce SH decline, yet their benefits are uncertain. The main objectives of this paper were to apply a comprehensive SH assessment framework to evaluate (i) SH differences in natural grasslands and cropping areas, and (ii) how conservation practices lessen SH deterioration. Soils under natural grasslands were compared to cropped soils from three long-term experiments with treatments evaluating the effects of cover crops and/or pastures incorporation; no-tillage; and crop fertilization for Uruguayan Mollisols. Soil chemical (pH, cation exchange capacity, macro, and micro-nutrients), physical (wet aggregate stability, available water holding capacity, penetration resistance), and biological (organic carbon, active carbon, protein, respiration) indicators were measured. SH was significantly lower across all indicators under cropped areas than under natural grasslands, especially when soil fertility is not adequately maintained in cropping systems. Conservation practices lessened SH degradation, particularly soil biological properties, but had confounding benefits. Overall, gains in SH were linked to adequate soil fertility maintenance and longer active plant growth periods associated with including pastures and cover crops in annual cropping systems. /© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
653 $aCover crops
653 $aNo-tillage
653 $aPastures
653 $aSequence intensification index
653 $aSoil health
653 $aSoil quality
700 1 $aSAWCHIK, J.
700 1 $aVAN ES, H.
773 $tSoil Security. 2022, Volume 9, 100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soisec.2022.100074 -- OPEN ACCESS.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
03/07/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
03/07/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Agropecuarias |
|
Autor : |
FERRARO, B.; SOARES DE LIMA, J.M.; FERNANDEZ, E.; LANFRANCO, B. |
|
Afiliación : |
BRUNO FERRARO ALBERTONI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JUAN MANUEL SOARES DE LIMA LAPETINA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ENRIQUE GENARO FERNANDEZ RODRIGUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; BRUNO ANTONIO LANFRANCO CRESPO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Inversión y reinversión en la actividad ganadera. |
|
Complemento del título : |
Socio-economía. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Revista INIA Uruguay, Junio 2021, no.65, p.35-39. |
|
Serie : |
(Revista INIA; 65). |
|
ISSN : |
1510-9011 |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Contenido : |
Los sistemas de producción ganaderos difieren no solamente en la orientación productiva sino también en su nivel tecnológico. Dicha orientación guarda relación con la dotación de recursos disponibles, los que, además, pueden tener mayor o menor incidencia sobre la aplicación de tecnología. Alcanzado un nivel de relativa eficiencia con los recursos disponibles, cualquier proceso posterior de mejora implicará un salto tecnológico que requiere la inversión de capital. ¿Cómo hacen los ganaderos uruguayos para financiar la adopción de nuevas técnicas?. ¿Cómo hacen para mantener lasinversiones que ya han sido realizadas?. |
|
Palabras claves : |
INVERSIONES GANADERAS; REINVERSIÓN EN SISTEMAS GANADEROS; UNIDAD DE ECONOMÍA APLICADA (INIA). |
|
Thesagro : |
GANADERIA; INVERSIONES. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
E10 Economía y políticas agrícolas |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/15760/1/Revista-INIA-65-Junio-2021-09.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01341naa a2200241 a 4500
001 1062226
005 2021-07-03
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1510-9011
100 1 $aFERRARO, B.
245 $aInversión y reinversión en la actividad ganadera.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
490 $a(Revista INIA; 65).
520 $aLos sistemas de producción ganaderos difieren no solamente en la orientación productiva sino también en su nivel tecnológico. Dicha orientación guarda relación con la dotación de recursos disponibles, los que, además, pueden tener mayor o menor incidencia sobre la aplicación de tecnología. Alcanzado un nivel de relativa eficiencia con los recursos disponibles, cualquier proceso posterior de mejora implicará un salto tecnológico que requiere la inversión de capital. ¿Cómo hacen los ganaderos uruguayos para financiar la adopción de nuevas técnicas?. ¿Cómo hacen para mantener lasinversiones que ya han sido realizadas?.
650 $aGANADERIA
650 $aINVERSIONES
653 $aINVERSIONES GANADERAS
653 $aREINVERSIÓN EN SISTEMAS GANADEROS
653 $aUNIDAD DE ECONOMÍA APLICADA (INIA)
700 1 $aSOARES DE LIMA, J.M.
700 1 $aFERNANDEZ, E.
700 1 $aLANFRANCO, B.
773 $tRevista INIA Uruguay, Junio 2021, no.65, p.35-39.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
